Evaluate the effectiveness of the responsive regulation model with reference to the regulatory powers and responses available under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. The WritePass Journal

Evaluate the effectiveness of the responsive regulation model with reference to the regulatory powers and responses available under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. Introduction Evaluate the effectiveness of the responsive regulation model with reference to the regulatory powers and responses available under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. ), 41 Common Law World Review 1. Case Law Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper’s Garage (Stourport) Ltd [1968] AC 269 Lloyd Shuhfabrik Meyer Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV [1999] ETMR 690 Lloyds Bank v Bundy [1974] 3 WLR 501 Macaulay v Scroeder Publishing Co Ltd   [1974] 1 WLR 1308 (HL) Office of Fair Trading v Purely Creative Ltd and Others [2011] EWHC 106 (Ch) Tiscali UK Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc [2008] EWHC 3129 (QB) [1] F Sudweeks and C T Romm., Doing Business on the Internet Opportunities and Pitfalls with 39 Figures (United States: Springer, Business Economics) 9. [2] [1999] ETMR 690 [3] P Stokes., ‘New OFT Powers in the Credit Clamp-Down’ (2005) 155 New Law Journal 236, Issue 7164. [4] [1974] 1 WLR 1308 (HL) [5] [1968] AC 269 [6] [1974] 3 WLR 501 [7] M J Trebilcock., ‘The Doctrine of Inequality of Bargaining Power: Post-Benthamite Economics in the House of Lords’ (1976) 26 University of Toronto Law Journal 4, 359. [8] S Brown., Protection of the Small Business as Credit Consumer: Paying Lip Service to Protection of the Vulnerable or Providing a Real Service to the Struggling Entrepreneur?’ (2012), 41 Common Law World Review 1, 59. [9] Office of Fair Trading., ‘Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008’ (2008) Information for Businesses on the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations, oft.gov.uk/business-advice/treating-customers-fairly/protection [Accessed 13 April, 2014].